Did you know we have a new hire, yes, an individual was hired as a Project Manager? He is being paid $2888.88 every two weeks. (No idea where that amount came from). That is $75,110.88 for the year (26 paydays)
Did you know he was hired as PART TIME? And being he was hired as part time a job application or resume was NOT required so the city does not have anything on record.
You will not see his name anywhere in the financial records, just an entry for contract labor every two weeks. This has to stop.
The other "Slush Fund" activity involves another contractor. This one is paid some $2750 per month, and the contract indicates "Not to exceed 20 hours per month." That's $2750 for only 20 hours of work, and not even that much really, it could be less than 20 hours too.
Did you read the San Antonio News about the Municipal Judges working less than 5 hours a day and one judge was quoted as saying, This is the sweetest Pig in town, don't say anything. I've got news for San Antonio, I believe Windcrest is in the running for the the Sweetest Pig award.
The current City Council approved both of the examples above last year and they both are still working in our City. Oh, you will not see them often, if at all. The new Project Manager after all does not have a contract or agreement detailing anything he does for the money. He is part time, Not required, remember?
Couple these two examples with the recent blog I read about our WEDC director getting some $90k from the EDC, plus receiving City employee health plan benefits for additional hours (doing??) for the mayor. Then has the gall to submit an invoice for overtime, which was paid. Paid, but out of the Special Legal Fees budget, not contractor work!
Also, the WEDC Director is a Contractor, and is listed in the financial records as Colunga Consulting Group, LLC. Then he also received the annual "Stipend" given to city employees. Giving a stipend to a LLC sound a bit questionable. You decide!
Monday, October 13, 2014
Monday, October 6, 2014
Windcrest Slush Fund for Cronies?
Seems this administration has their very own "Slush Fund"!
Case in Point.
The WEDC hired Robert Colunga @ $90,000 as a contract employee. The WEDC does not pay medical or benefits, just a straight contract for $90,000 working as the WEDC Director.
Then Robert Colunga goes to Mayor Baxter and request Medical Benefits. The Mayor and council, (Jim Shelton, Jake Jacobi and Pam Dodson voted for this) approved Resolution 2012-414(R) Colunga receiving city employee medical benefits. The resolution said medical benefits for working an additional 8 hours per week.
An open records request for a copy of the contract, agreement etc, for this additional 8 hours per week returned a letter stating, "The Resolution is the contract".
Are you still with me? Colunga now works for WEDC, I assume a 40 hour week, plus he works for the City an additonal 8 hours per week doing 'whatever'.
Those are his TWO contracts. Now in Feb 2014 Robert Colunga was paid and additional $1500.
The invoice says he worked additional hours. Plus you will NOT find that $1500 under contract employment or anywhere you would recognize.
He was paid $1500 out of SPECIAL LEGAL FEES. account! Talk about hiding the numbers. So much for being "Transparent" and "Open". The budget has some $110,000 in 514-255
Rafael Castillo, City Manager is responsible for maintaining a balanced budget. He evidently sleept thru the ethics portion of those financial management classes.
I believe entering this transaction in the Special Legal Fees subcode reflects either a high level of incompetence, or a high level of corruption, take your pick. Either way the present administration condones this very odd management of our budget.
It is time to get control of the finances folks. Jake Jacobi, Jim Shelton and Pam Dodson should be replaced.
Case in Point.
The WEDC hired Robert Colunga @ $90,000 as a contract employee. The WEDC does not pay medical or benefits, just a straight contract for $90,000 working as the WEDC Director.
Then Robert Colunga goes to Mayor Baxter and request Medical Benefits. The Mayor and council, (Jim Shelton, Jake Jacobi and Pam Dodson voted for this) approved Resolution 2012-414(R) Colunga receiving city employee medical benefits. The resolution said medical benefits for working an additional 8 hours per week.
An open records request for a copy of the contract, agreement etc, for this additional 8 hours per week returned a letter stating, "The Resolution is the contract".
Are you still with me? Colunga now works for WEDC, I assume a 40 hour week, plus he works for the City an additonal 8 hours per week doing 'whatever'.
Those are his TWO contracts. Now in Feb 2014 Robert Colunga was paid and additional $1500.
The invoice says he worked additional hours. Plus you will NOT find that $1500 under contract employment or anywhere you would recognize.
He was paid $1500 out of SPECIAL LEGAL FEES. account! Talk about hiding the numbers. So much for being "Transparent" and "Open". The budget has some $110,000 in 514-255
Rafael Castillo, City Manager is responsible for maintaining a balanced budget. He evidently sleept thru the ethics portion of those financial management classes.
I believe entering this transaction in the Special Legal Fees subcode reflects either a high level of incompetence, or a high level of corruption, take your pick. Either way the present administration condones this very odd management of our budget.
It is time to get control of the finances folks. Jake Jacobi, Jim Shelton and Pam Dodson should be replaced.
A Vote for Dan Reese, Henry Moncada, and Mike Scott can stop this nonsense.!
Saturday, November 2, 2013
Windcrest Trash Contracts?
Did you know a PAC in Arizona made a $2000 donation to Impact Windcrest PAC, the same PAC that promotes Mayor Alan Baxter and Councilman John Gretz?
Yes, all of those expensive looking full page glossy mail outs are being supported by an Arizona PAC.
Consider this link:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expenditures.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00428391
It shows an expenditure of $2000 to Impact Windcrest Cmte.PAC
Question: Who is Republic Services and why did they donate $2000 to the City of Windcrest, Impact Windcrest PAC?
The answer lies right in plain view. Go to the Windcrest City Web site. Click on: http://www.ci.windcrest.tx.us/index.aspx?NID=246;
This page addresses Curb Side pickup. Look in the second paragraph and click the underlined word: Allied Services/BFI
That link takes you directly to their home web site. Republicservices.com Yep, the same company that has the City Garbage/Trash Contract. Those garbage trucks rolling thru our streets and alleys belong to Allied Services/BFI whose parent is Republic Services. Is there a connection? Is this a level playing field for other garbage/trash vendors? Windcrest not only needs new leadership, Windcrest Deserves new leadership!
Mark Perry for Mayor and Dennis Allen for City Council Place 5 is the needed leadership change.
Yes, all of those expensive looking full page glossy mail outs are being supported by an Arizona PAC.
Consider this link:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expenditures.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00428391
It shows an expenditure of $2000 to Impact Windcrest Cmte.PAC
Republic Services Expenditures | OpenSecrets - OpenSecrets.org. 10, Impact Windcrest Cmte Pac, $2,000
REPUBLIC SVCS. INC. EMPLOYEES FOR BETTER GOVT. PAC
Location: PHOENIX, AZ 85054
Question: Who is Republic Services and why did they donate $2000 to the City of Windcrest, Impact Windcrest PAC?
The answer lies right in plain view. Go to the Windcrest City Web site. Click on: http://www.ci.windcrest.tx.us/index.aspx?NID=246;
This page addresses Curb Side pickup. Look in the second paragraph and click the underlined word: Allied Services/BFI
That link takes you directly to their home web site. Republicservices.com Yep, the same company that has the City Garbage/Trash Contract. Those garbage trucks rolling thru our streets and alleys belong to Allied Services/BFI whose parent is Republic Services. Is there a connection? Is this a level playing field for other garbage/trash vendors? Windcrest not only needs new leadership, Windcrest Deserves new leadership!
Mark Perry for Mayor and Dennis Allen for City Council Place 5 is the needed leadership change.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Windcrest -Millions Missing- Misleading Statements
The City of Windcrest is back in the news. Misleading statements made by Mayor Alan Baxter and missing dollars were reported in a newspaper story this week.
City Councilman, James McFall is running unopposed. His wife Bel was quoted in an October 29th My SA newspaper saying residents are upset about many things, including allegations of millions of missing dollars. Another person said she was concerned about misleading statements made by incumbent Mayor Alan Baxter.
Maybe the above has some bearing on why the approved 2013-14 budget has not been released. The Mayor and Council may not want the citizens to see the actual budget before the Election day. It has been suppressed for most of early voting. Early voting ends tomorrow, Friday, November 1st, 2013. period and right now the FY 2013-14 Approved budget is nowhere to be found. Is this because James McFall and his wife know more than Windcrest Citizens? You gotta believe, that if James McFall knows, then John Gretz (running city council for place 5) also knows. Evidently the entire council knows something along with the Mayor and city manager, because the budget is not available for citizens to view. Oh, the Proposed budget is online, but that one does not have the full facts.
Last year the 2013 budget was placed on the web site on Nov 1st, but only after several citizens complained to the Attorney General's office. Did the complaint have any affect on the release? One would believe not, being the same thing is happening this year.
I fail to recognize any reason for not posting the approved budget on the effective date of October 1st.
After-all, Council worked the budget for several months, had two public hearing and still can't post the budget by the effective date. Why not? Early voters would have had ample time to review the budget before casting their vote. If the approved budget is posted between now and election day, citizens will have little time to review and digest the content. I expect the FY 2013-14 budget will be placed on the city web page soon, but too late for many voters. Is that the plan?
For example, on the proposed budget, one department shows being $102,000 over budget. Yes, they projected to spend $102,000 more than the expected revenue. What was the City Manager, Rafael Castillo thinking? The City Manager, I believe, is suppose to present a balanced budget to council.
According to the reporter, literature handed out by Alan Baxter and John Gretz supporters claim funding by Impact Windcrest PAC, but Impact Windcrest wasn't listed with the Texas Ethics Commission as a registered PAC. Windcrest Wins, PAC is registered with the Ethics commission. Because Windcrest does not offer postal boxes, the PAC uses a San Antonio PO box for correspondence.
Place 5 candidate Dennis Allen sat with members of political action committee Windcrest Wins under a white tent. Mr. Allen is a newbie to politics; Windcrest Wins also endorsed Mark Perry, who is challenging Baxter. Windcrest needs a change in leadership, Mark Perry and Dennis Allen represent this change!!
Read the entire article here: Sleeper Election\\\
City Councilman, James McFall is running unopposed. His wife Bel was quoted in an October 29th My SA newspaper saying residents are upset about many things, including allegations of millions of missing dollars. Another person said she was concerned about misleading statements made by incumbent Mayor Alan Baxter.
Maybe the above has some bearing on why the approved 2013-14 budget has not been released. The Mayor and Council may not want the citizens to see the actual budget before the Election day. It has been suppressed for most of early voting. Early voting ends tomorrow, Friday, November 1st, 2013. period and right now the FY 2013-14 Approved budget is nowhere to be found. Is this because James McFall and his wife know more than Windcrest Citizens? You gotta believe, that if James McFall knows, then John Gretz (running city council for place 5) also knows. Evidently the entire council knows something along with the Mayor and city manager, because the budget is not available for citizens to view. Oh, the Proposed budget is online, but that one does not have the full facts.
Last year the 2013 budget was placed on the web site on Nov 1st, but only after several citizens complained to the Attorney General's office. Did the complaint have any affect on the release? One would believe not, being the same thing is happening this year.
I fail to recognize any reason for not posting the approved budget on the effective date of October 1st.
After-all, Council worked the budget for several months, had two public hearing and still can't post the budget by the effective date. Why not? Early voters would have had ample time to review the budget before casting their vote. If the approved budget is posted between now and election day, citizens will have little time to review and digest the content. I expect the FY 2013-14 budget will be placed on the city web page soon, but too late for many voters. Is that the plan?
For example, on the proposed budget, one department shows being $102,000 over budget. Yes, they projected to spend $102,000 more than the expected revenue. What was the City Manager, Rafael Castillo thinking? The City Manager, I believe, is suppose to present a balanced budget to council.
According to the reporter, literature handed out by Alan Baxter and John Gretz supporters claim funding by Impact Windcrest PAC, but Impact Windcrest wasn't listed with the Texas Ethics Commission as a registered PAC. Windcrest Wins, PAC is registered with the Ethics commission. Because Windcrest does not offer postal boxes, the PAC uses a San Antonio PO box for correspondence.
Place 5 candidate Dennis Allen sat with members of political action committee Windcrest Wins under a white tent. Mr. Allen is a newbie to politics; Windcrest Wins also endorsed Mark Perry, who is challenging Baxter. Windcrest needs a change in leadership, Mark Perry and Dennis Allen represent this change!!
Read the entire article here: Sleeper Election\\\
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Where is Transparency in Windcrest?
The Windcrest City Council meetings are recorded and available for live streaming, however, if you missed the live meeting, actually viewing the official video may be delayed for days. The process of posting council meeting videos to the city web page appears to vary depending on the content of the video.
Posting a video to the city web page for public viewing is a straight forward process requiring a few minutes at the computer to accomplish. In fact, some council meeting videos have been posted as early as the following morning so you know it's possible.
It appears, if the content of the meeting is anything controversial, posting the video is delayed for several days. Why is that? Maybe because Mayor Alan E. Baxter and councilman John Gretz are running for re election. Running for office saying "we are Open and Transparent" while delaying the release of public information, amounts to nothing more than smoke and mirrors. Controlling what is released and when is not being open and transparent.
Windcrest has ordinances such as the number of animals allowed per household, speed limits, signs, and weeds etc. Windcrest should enact an ordinance dictating council meeting videos be posted to the city web page within 48 hours. This idea would not allow city officials to use the current smoke and mirror delay tactics.
Sadly, the faster process is to submit an Open Records request for the video. Even that process is allowed 10 working days, but at least you will receive the video.
Mark Perry is running for Mayor to replace Mayor Baxter and Dennis Allen is running for City Council place 5 to replace John Gretz. These two individuals will end the delay tactics and provide Windcrest with real transparency, not smoke and mirrors.
Posting a video to the city web page for public viewing is a straight forward process requiring a few minutes at the computer to accomplish. In fact, some council meeting videos have been posted as early as the following morning so you know it's possible.
It appears, if the content of the meeting is anything controversial, posting the video is delayed for several days. Why is that? Maybe because Mayor Alan E. Baxter and councilman John Gretz are running for re election. Running for office saying "we are Open and Transparent" while delaying the release of public information, amounts to nothing more than smoke and mirrors. Controlling what is released and when is not being open and transparent.
Windcrest has ordinances such as the number of animals allowed per household, speed limits, signs, and weeds etc. Windcrest should enact an ordinance dictating council meeting videos be posted to the city web page within 48 hours. This idea would not allow city officials to use the current smoke and mirror delay tactics.
Sadly, the faster process is to submit an Open Records request for the video. Even that process is allowed 10 working days, but at least you will receive the video.
Mark Perry is running for Mayor to replace Mayor Baxter and Dennis Allen is running for City Council place 5 to replace John Gretz. These two individuals will end the delay tactics and provide Windcrest with real transparency, not smoke and mirrors.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Fire Chief Salary Question e-Mails
The E-mail exchanges below were between Don Myles, Mayor Baxter and Rackspace concerning the Windcrest Fire Chief Salary Question. Start reading from the bottom of this email to read the emails in the order received.
----- Original Message ----- From: Dons---To Windcrest Citizens
From: Donald xxxxxx
Hey, Ya'll:
Here is Rackspace's General Counsel's official reply to my question about Graham Weston's "alleged" endorsement of Alan Baxter's re-election campaign for Mayor, as was printed in his latest election pamphlet (not a flier)! Ya'll may want to consider some way you can get this information out to our voting public.
Alan keeps asking to meet with me for a "discussion" about Dan Reese and the Fire Chief's salary; and I keep telling him NO, unless he is going to discuss how he is going to make the changes I have requested NLT City Council Meeting, next Monday.
Keep up the good work.
Don xxxx
----- Original Message ----- From: Alan xxxxx
To: D
Sqqqwsxdgjl
Oolooo
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: SALARY QUESTION
Dear Mr. Myles,
Thank you for your email. I want to clarify that Graham Weston has not endorsed any candidate in the Windcrest City Council elections, and Rackspace as a policy does not endorse candidates in elections. Further, we have not authorized any publication that implies otherwise. The quote in the mailer you refer to was from a magazine article printed months ago. Although Rackspace as a company does not endorse candidates, we encourage credible candidates to schedule a visit to our campus and give our employees a chance to meet them and freely discuss campaign issues, their platforms and viewpoints.
We at Rackspace appreciate the direction that Windcrest has taken over the past couple of years since the change of leadership at the City, and we look forward to working with the City Council in the future on issues of mutual interest, no matter who is ultimately elected in November.
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
Best, Alan
5000 Walzem Road
San Antonio, Texas 78218
----- Original Message ----- From: Don xxx---To Rackspace
xxxxxx
From: Donald <> Date: Monday, October 14, 2013 10:05 PM To: rackspace
> Subject: Fw: SALARY QUESTION
I believe that it is important for me to furnish you copies of these latest emails between Mayor Baxter and myself. Mayor Baxter's latest manipulation and badgering of personnel into leaving our City or retiring early from key leadership positions has resulted in the resignation of our Fire Chief, Dan Reese, effective 1 Nov 2013. My emails reflect my humble efforts to get Mayor Baxter to turn this situation around and retain the Fire Chief. You'll see my reasons and get a better picture of the situation after you read my emails. This latest personnel debacle by Mayor Baxter is just another example of his "lousy" and ineffective personnel policies and management. He is a successful "promoter" but an unsuccessful people person and people leader! If we do not convince the Mayor to correct this situation, I'm afraid what he and his City Council will do, as they have done in the past, is appoint a more junior, less experienced Chief to lead this extremely critical City department. I think ya'll should be concerned about this action, since our Windcrest Fire Department is responsible for the safety and well-being of your personnel and physical plant when medical care and fire prevention and protection are needed.
By the way, Graham, I was quite surprised when your picture and strong, personal endorsement of Mayor Baxter appeared on the front page of his latest 8-page re-election campaign pamphlet mailed to all Windcrest residents. Just in case you haven't seen the pamphlet, he quoted you as follows: "Mayor Alan Baxter has revealed a great vision for the city of Windcrest, and it's been a pleasure to work alongside him as we build a strong civic and corporate relationship . . . Just like Rackspace, the mayor values transparency and openness, and this has served the city well." It was signed, "Graham Weston, Rackspace Founder and Chairman of the Board," with your snapshot next to your name. Did you really make this endorsement; did you give the Mayor permission to print it; and intend to have it mailed to all Windcrest residents?
If I can be so bold to ask, any help and support you can give to the reinstatement of our Fire Chief and to the establishment of a fair and equitable salary level for the Fire Chief position will be greatly appreciated by myself and all our Windcrest residents. (Also, in case you may be wondering, I am supporting Mark Perry and Dennis Allen in the upcoming election!)
Thanks much for your time and consideration.
Don Myles, Ph.D.
Former Mayor
City of Windcrest
----- Original Message ----- From: Don
To: Alan Baxter
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: SALARY QUESTION
I don't believe there is anything to discuss with you, Alan, unless it is a discussion or explanation of your Plan of Action to (1) retain Dan Reese as Fire Chief, (2) establish a respectable and sensible salary rate for the Fire Chief position, as I have spelled out in my below email to you, and (3) set an agenda to complete these actions at the upcoming City Council Meeting on 21 Oct 2013.
You can complete these actions, Alan, if you make the decision to do it! You have demonstrated many times that once you establish a goal, you will complete it! Our City deserves an experienced Fire Chief who is a proven leader and a man of the highest integrity, and one who is paid a fair and decent salary comparable and equal to the critical responsibilities and duties of that position.
Thank you,
Don .
----- Original Message ----- From:Alan Baxter
To: Donald
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 8:42 AM
Subject: RE: SALARY QUESTION
I would be happy to sit down and discuss this issue with you.
----- Original Message ----- From: Don
From: Donald [mailto: Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 8:18 PM
To: Alan Subject: Re: SALARY QUESTION
Mayor Alan:
No, Alan, your reply does not answer my question. I've thought long and hard, over the past eight days, about your reply and this issue, i.e., Dan Reese and his position as Chief, Windcrest Volunteer Fire Department. I believe we know each other well enough that I can be honest and direct with you on this subject through the following points:
1. Turn this situation around and retain Dan Reese as the Fire Chief! If you would personally commit yourself to this goal like you have to completing a $300,000.00 improvement to a Takas Park pond and winning your current re-election campaign, you can personally advocate for Dan Reese to be our Fire Chief at a respectable salary rate. Your fellow City Council members will get behind you and approve this action. After all, as you said, "we have the money, and we intend to raise the compensation."
2. At the risk of getting your ire up, Alan, make me not believe that the reason you are not advocating for Dan Reese is because his resigning and leaving allows you to finally accomplish your long-term goal of getting rid of (or "cleaning house") all the personnel who were in key leadership positions or in positions of high responsibility during the previous Mayor Jack Leonhardt administration. After all, Chief Dan Reese is the last one left from that time!
3. (Hoping that you have not destroyed this email after reading the above paragraph and are continuing to read it) A salary of $48K ($36K for Fire Chief and $12K for additional duty of Fire Inspector) or $61K--figures that have been mentioned by you and other sources--is not a respectable or sensible salary for our Fire Chief for the following reasons: (a) the average salary for fire chief position in our immediate surrounding cities is approximately $77K; (b) a beginning police officer, without any experience, in our City makes $38K; (c) base salary for the Windcrest Police Chief is approx. $67K, without any additional duties--that's $31K more than the Fire Chief, with additional duties; add in benefits, and the Police Chief's salary is at nearly $88K; and (d) at a Fire Chief salary of $48K, a City Admin. Secretary, Public Works Technician, and City Postal Clerk would have annual salaries nearly as much as the Fire Chief; the Fleet Mechanic would
make more! Fire Chief annual salary rates at $48K or $61K make no sense and reflect poor personnel management policies and practices!
4. As I said in my earlier email, Alan, the responsibilities and duties of the Fire Chief are of the highest critical nature--directing fire department operations; supervising, mentoring, and training young volunteer firefighters and EMS technicians who save lives; and being a firefighter and EMS technician, himself. And, if the City so acts, the Chief would have an additional, critical duty of Fire Inspector. All of these, as well as others I have not listed, are responsibilities and duties just as critical and aschallenging as those of a Police Chief. As such, the salary levels should be very similar, if not the same. These conclusions are not just mine but are also those of "Public Sector" salary surveys and Fire Chief salary levels set by our surrounding cities.
5. To quote you, Alan, "I really like Chief Reese . . .;" "we, as a city, want to do what is right;" and "we are in uncharted waters." You can do what is right, Alan, and be a strong Captain of the ship. Sail the ship (or our City) out of troubled, uncharted waters. Give the Fire Chief, Dan Reese, the respectable and sensible salary that he and the position deserve. You can do it as soon as the next City Council meeting on Monday, 21 October. There and then, take the lead! Put a $70K - $80K salary level for the Fire Chief position on the agenda and on the table. Advocate for its approval; and lead the Council to take a vote to approve! Our Fire Department will continue to be strong, and our City and citizens will be safer.
Thanks much.
Don Myles, Ph.D.
----- Original Message ----- From:Alan Baxter
To:Donald
Cc:Pamela Dodson ; Rafael Castillo ; Sarah Mangham ; Michael Brenan () ; Dan
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: SALARY QUESTION
Dr. Myles,
Thank you for your email.
The Fire Chief was paid the figure you mentioned as that was the highest salary allowable under the law, as he was not fully qualified when he took over the position. Just recently, he became fully qualified.
When the position went out at the time Chief Reese applied, it was not advertised at a salary level you indicate. Please remember, we are a Volunteer Fire Department. This administration has made it
clear that we do not want to move towards a paid Fire Department. We want to keep it a volunteer department. You might recall, prior administrations pushed for a paid Fire Department, and it was even mentioned in the MEIA that the city signed prior to this administration and prior to the current WEDC’s tenure.
We have been doing research to find an apples to apples scenario on what a VFD Chief gets paid. We have only found one example. Coincidentally, this one example did not pay the Fire Chief what the Police Chief made.
We are trying to do what is right for all involved. During this time, the Chief retained a lawyer. Well, that slows things down. I really like Chief Reese and have worked quite a bit with him over the last two years. We, as a city, want to do what is right. We are in uncharted waters.
The Council has stated on many occasions on the record that we will move the salary needle with regard to this position with a budget adjustment. We have the money and we intend to raise the compensation. We are planning to have a special meeting before the Regular City Council Meeting on October 21 to do just that.
I hope this answers your question.
Feel free to call me to discuss further if you wish.
----- Original Message ----- From:Don Myles
From: Donald [] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 12:02 AM To: xxx Subject: SALARY QUESTION
Mayor Alan:
Could you please explain to me why the Fire Chief salary is set at only $16,000.00 (approx.) per year?
I believe that it is time for you and the Council to pay that position a salary that is equal to the critical responsibilities of the job--directing fire department operations, supervising and training volunteer firefighters who save lives; and fighting fires and saving lives, himself. Carrying out these responsibilities and duties certainly deserves a salary equal to the Police Chief, and greater than an Administrative Secretary, Postal Clerk, or Public Works Technician--all of whom are currently paid more than the Fire Chief!
How do ya'll justify such a low pay scale for such a critical position/job? Thank you.
Don
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Windcrest Fire Chief Forced to Resign
Chief Dan Reese, the Windcrest Fire Chief, has submitted his resignation letter. Chief Reese
spoke during a recent City Council meeting, detailing his research on Fire Chief salaries around Texas. He asked that his current minimum wage salary be increased to equal that of other volunteer Fire Departments. He also noted he is the current Emergency Management Coordinator which warrants additional increases. The 2013014 budget was approved with the Fire Chief's salary unchanged from the previous years.
Read the entire letter for your self on the Windcrest Win PAC web site, click here.
It's unconscionable that Windcrest spends over $300,000 on pond improvements while funding the Fire Chief's position at minimum wage.
spoke during a recent City Council meeting, detailing his research on Fire Chief salaries around Texas. He asked that his current minimum wage salary be increased to equal that of other volunteer Fire Departments. He also noted he is the current Emergency Management Coordinator which warrants additional increases. The 2013014 budget was approved with the Fire Chief's salary unchanged from the previous years.
Read the entire letter for your self on the Windcrest Win PAC web site, click here.
It's unconscionable that Windcrest spends over $300,000 on pond improvements while funding the Fire Chief's position at minimum wage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)